6 Comments
User's avatar
Will Food Forest Permaculture's avatar

the fucking Jews are unclean, like filthy and disgusting. they need soap ironically. when I get a mouthy one in on line arguing, I try to wash his mouth out with soap. sometimes I call him "Soapy" for a nickname. I gotta lotta memes for this shit.

Expand full comment
Dennis liam ardell's avatar

I can not imagine any German wanting to take a bath with soap made out of a Jew.

Logically it is an oxymoron ; only morons would ever believe.

If Germans were repulsed by Jewish, behavior , why would they want to rub their skin with Jewish, soap?

This would be laughable, if it was not such a disgusting lie told by Jews.

Shame on All Jewish , perpetrators of this lie about Germans.

The wilder Jewish, stories are manufactured ; hopefully one day soon , all the lies regarding the alleged six million ;will finally confronted ,and dealt with in an open debate, free from the threat of three and five year prison sentences .

Long live the German , ideals , and, nation.

Expand full comment
SS Man's avatar

I’m sorry, but the Jew soap nonsense is hilarious to me. It’s so ridiculous I can’t help but laugh.

Expand full comment
Panjandrum's avatar

If you've ever tried engaging with a person in real life (irl) on the hoax, you might have experienced a quick takedown.

Right off the block, you might find yourself accused of being a "h... denier", or "Nazi", or "Nazi apologist", "Hitler lover" or the catch-all "what's wrong with you?"- and essentially you will get shutdown real fast because you will have been outed to be just a horrifyingly bad person. If it's many against you, no one will literally take your side to even let you come up for air.

If the other person is bit more calmer, then you will likely encounter phrases such as the following thrown at you "Oh come on, it's a settled topic" or the clincher "It's not open for debate". Again, if it's a group setting, you stand no chance - no one will want to perceived as at best charitably eccentric - akin to believing in flat earth and at worst a monster who will "be open" to believing in evil things.

The above article gives one a way out to create an Everton Window irl for a plausible limited success. If the other party is ready to hear you out, especially if they haven't heard your headline position yet - begin with nuggets of the above piece. State your headline viewpoint around that jewish soap of an atrocity. Chances are, they might not agree with you - somewhere deep inside their received programming on this front - being muted - their innate cognitive dissonance - might alert to them that this - THIS- nugget of atrocity info might not be true. They might say this feebly, in which case play the devil's advocate - ask them that surely they are not Nazi apologists?

Then push hard for them to agree - state that it was proven at the trials at nuremberg in a court of law, (it's important to use the entire phrase they should not yet get the sense it was a kangaroo court, that defendants were tortured or that it was anything but adversarial). Keep a stoic straight sincere face as you go along. Then state that hundreds or thousands of camp inmates have been on record on testifying to use it, have the facts memorized and recount as much as you can. Make sure you include that factoids that it was used to make "war-vital commodities as soap, fats and fertilizer” and that "soap, glue and train oil” were made in at least two special factories in Germany. Offer that you are ready to provide sources. For example at the main Nuremberg trial. L. N. Smirnov, Chief Counsellor of Justice for the USSR, declared to the Tribunal: "In the Danzig Anatomical Institute, semi-industrial experiments in the production of soap from human bodies and the tanning of human skin for industrial purposes were carried out.” Have the page number ready. Include grim facts that jewish soaps had been exhibited in NY Institutes and Gdasnk museum. Try not to use denigrate -no laden words such as soap bars was show-cased etc

Lean on it. The more outrageous the claims you can tell aloud the better.

At this point, the other party -if they are half-way awake - might rebel, sense a moment coming, or keep quiet sensing a massive rug-pull. Stay tight. You may even want to bail out at this point leaving them with just the slightest hint that you were being the devil's advocate. Walk away. At some point, they will go search it out themselves. Or they will get back to you, asking what;s the catch?

If they hesitatingly inquire is there a counter claim then admit yes - scholarly - use that word scholarly- revisionist jewish historians such as such as Walter Laqueur's 1980 book, The Terrible Secret, Gitta Sereny Jewish historian, book Into That Darkness, jewish historian Yehuda Bauer, and jewish historian Shmuel Krakowski. Have some quotes ready from these folks and leave it at that. Say you should believe victims and not scholars of history even if they were jewish. Then back off. Unless they are super-dull they will get the point.

You might not walk away from this convo with the overt WIN or even immediately but you will have sparked a seed of doubt.

Expand full comment
Darkstar's avatar
4dEdited

Who would use such a soap ?

I'd much rather do without.

😄😄😄😄😄😄

Expand full comment
Will Food Forest Permaculture's avatar

I know right. the creepy fucking disgusting Jews are so oblivious to their own odious reality that they would never even think of the fact that nobody would ever want to use their soap. but they probably can only think of the fact that since soap made from holohoaxed Jews would be theoretically FREE, that there's money in it, so it must be a reasonable idea oi veh.

Expand full comment