It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt4

By Noble

Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature & conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible.

Note- “IT’S A HOLOHOAX (don’t be fooled)” are series of blog posts that thoroughly expose the Jewish Holocaust lie. There were no “Nazi Death Camps” and no “Nazi Gas Chambers”. You have been fooled! This is your opportunity to break free of the mind control you have been taught in school and in the media. You have been deceived! We all have… but never again.

It has been said that it is easier to believe a lie one has heard a hundred times, than a truth one has never heard before. We have heard 6 million lies about the “Holocaust”. The truth about the Holohoax has been hidden. Read below to uncover the cover-up!

Note: This blog series is derived from “Did Six Million Really Die?” book by Richard E. Harwood (1974) with many additional sources, originally presented in DJ Noble Protagonist’s E-book (The Battle to preserve Western Civilization): https://archive.org/details/@nobleprotagonist

Note: Core reference material: https://holocausthandbooks.com/

Also in German: http://holocausthandbuecher.com/

TREBLINKA WAS A TRANSIT CAMP

Holocaust (Holohoax) survivors report that at least 700,000, and perhaps as many as three million, people primarily of Jewish faith were murdered in the Treblinka camp, located in Eastern Poland, between the summers of 1942 and 1943. Their bodies were alleged to have been buried in mass graves.

Various murder weapons are claimed, yet no forensic evidence provided to have been used; mobile or stationary gas chambers, quicklime, hot steam, high voltage electricity, machine guns, vacuum chambers, chlorine gas, Zyklon B and diesel exhaust gas.

The “eyewitness” testimony & accounts that exist, in regard to the Treblinka group of camps, are completely contradictory of each other. The witness claims diverge so widely; not only where the numbers of victims are concerned, but also with respect to the alleged methods of killing, about the way the bodies and evidence were eliminated, and about the location, size, form and equipment of the alleged extermination camp, that it is impossible to cull a plausible overall account.

No evidence of victims has ever surfaced. The elimination of victims without a trace is a vital link in the chain of evidence for the Holocaust (Holohoax) in general. Elimination without a trace is the prerequisite for an arbitrary number of victims. This is how the numbers of victims alleged for Treblinka come to vary from 700,000 to 3 million, a phenomenon that also appears in other Holohoax-related cases.

The technically unrealistic claims regarding the mass murder of human beings are compounded by the utterly unbelievable accounts of the removal of bodies without any trace. Millions of dead cannot simply vanish into thin air.

A detailed forensic examination of the Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, has found “no evidence” of mass graves there. For six days in October 1999, an Australian forensics team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland.

According to Krege, “Historians say that the bodies were exhumed & cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp’s use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed.”

German aerial reconnaissance photographs taken in 1944 of the Treblinka camp also cast serious doubts on the widely accepted Holohoax story that Treblinka was a mass extermination center. Discovered in 1989 in the National Archives in Washington, D.C., these photographs corroborate other evidence indicating that Treblinka was actually a transit camp.

The photographs indicate that Treblinka was an extremely small camp. The camp’s burial area is too small to contain the hundreds of thousands of bodies supposedly buried there. Treblinka was not particularly well guarded or isolated. The aerial photographs show that fields where Polish farmers planted & cultivated crops were directly adjacent to the camp perimeter, and were cultivated right up to the edge of the camp.

John C. Ball, a geologist with experience interpreting aerial photographs, has reviewed the wartime aerial photos taken of Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor. Ball concludes, “To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at ‘any location’ in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two. Further, air photo analysis refutes the claim that the ‘Nazis’ had intended, at whatever time, to keep events, in the alleged extermination camps, secret.”

Walter Luftl, a court-recognized expert engineer who headed a large engineering firm in Vienna, concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with diesel engines & gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation. Luftl stated, “The laws of nature apply both to Nazis and anti-Fascists. Nobody can be killed with ‘diesel exhaust gas’ in the manner described (in the Holocaust literature).”

There is no compelling evidence that the Aktion Reinhardt camps, of Bełzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, were extermination centers in which Jews were systematically put to death.

The Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps rather than extermination camps. The demographic studies, the numerous statements from Heinrich Himmler, the reports of transfers of Jews from the Aktion Reinhardt camps to Auschwitz & Majdanek, the lack of credible forensic evidence that mass exterminations occurred at the camps, the photographic and engineering evidence, the impossibility of disposing of so many bodies in such a short period of time, the relative lack of secrecy & security in the camps, and the small size of the areas where the bodies were supposedly buried all indicate that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps.

“ENIGMA” CODE CRACKED

In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” code, with the probable secret assistance of traitors within the German aristocratic class. This undermined the German war effort, but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the National Socialist concentration camp system.

Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted & decrypted. To keep the Holohoax going, historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to “arrivals”, “departures”, recorded deaths and other events at these camps.

The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted “Enigma” code data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox “Holocaust” (Holohoax) narrative. The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder & racial genocide. Quite the opposite; it reveals that the Germans were determined, even desperate, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics.

Note: Operation Ultra was the codename for the British cryptologists efforts at Bletchley Park to intercept & break German coded messages. While Ultra initially was the cryptonym for the project to break the German Enigma machine, the code name came to represent all British efforts to break high-level German radio codes during World War 2.

Note: In 1943, the British finally cracked the code to access German naval activities.

SCHINDLER’S LIST IS FICTION

Steven Spielberg’s mendacious (lying) anti-German libel, “Schindler’s List,” is based upon a novel, a work of fiction, titled in its first edition, “Schindler’s Ark”, by the Australian writer, Thomas Keneally. Keneally’s work is riddled with errors and “Holocaust” extermination narratives. There are certain aspects of Keneally’s book that Spielberg omitted from the movie. Keneally mentioned that Schindler worked for the powerful Hungarian Jew, Rudolf Kastner.

Nowhere will this information be found in the “Schindler’s List” movie, because in 1944, Kastner helped Eichmann deport hundreds of thousands of Jews to Auschwitz, in return for favorable treatment for Kastner’s Zionist cronies. The fact of high level cooperation between National Socialists & Zionists was too embarrassing to be included in Spielberg’s pro-Zionist film.

There are many instances of attempts by the German military to secure humane conditions within the concentration camps.

For example, in 1943, SS Judge Konrad Morgen of the Haupt Amt Gericht (SS-HAG) was assigned to investigate and prosecute brutality at Buchenwald. Morgen was so successful in correcting conditions there that Heinrich Himmler gave him an expanded staff and unlimited investigative authority in the camps. Morgen’s next target of inquiry was Krakau-Plaszow and its commandant, Amon Goeth, the arch-fiend of Speilberg’s film.

In “Schindler’s List”, Morgen’s entire investigation of Goeth was reduced to a scene in which fleeting reference is made to Goeth having his books “audited”.

The crucial truth that Steven Spielberg intentionally withheld from his gullible audience is that in September of 1944, Goeth was arrested by the Central Office of the SS Judiciary and imprisoned on charges of theft and the murder of concentration camp inmates. Spielberg was certainly aware of this fact, since the arrest is mentioned in Chapter 31 of Keneally’s book, upon which the movie is allegedly based.

Spielberg whitewashes the guilt of the Ordnungdienst (OD), the Jewish ghetto police, who worked for the National Socialists. Though occasionally shown taking bribes and helping the Germans control Jewish crowds, their main role in the movie is that of bystanders & traffic monitors. In real life however, many OD were ruthless killers.

Toward the end of the movie, Schindler is shown being presented with an inscribed gold ring by the Jews he rescued. We are told that the inscription is from the Talmud, “He who saves a single life, saves the entire world.” The saying has a nice, warm, humanistic tenor, but that’s not what the Talmud says.

The actual Talmud verse states, “Whosoever preserves a single soul (a Jew) of Israel, Scripture ascribes to him as if he had preserved a complete world” (Tractate Sanhedrin 37a). The Talmud only praises the saving of Jewish lives. In Spielberg’s non-stop Hollywood deception, even the documented contents of sacred Jewish texts are falsified.

Much has been made of the supposed “conciliatory nature” of Schindler’s List because it shows exactly two Germans, the Schindler couple, acting decently. However it depicts every member of the German military as either a monster or a homicidal robot. The perpetuation of this false stereotype constitutes “hate” propaganda, and is anti-White.

“Schindler’s List” is more sophisticated than other “Holocaust” propaganda films, having been crafted by the most successful director in Hollywood, who is clever enough to give his villains some characteristics of self-doubt, complaint and fatigue. But the film is nonetheless historically fraudulent. It is fiction!

This film has been shown in many children’s classrooms in the West and is portrayed as historically accurate. This is pure Zionist-occupied government propaganda that needs to be debunked and thrown in the garbage, along with other anti-White Hollywood trash, like Inglourious Basterds & Django Unchained.

ANNE FRANK BEST-SELLER IS A FRAUD

Of the many Jewish (fictional) memoirs that present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly the Anne Frank Diary and the truth concerning this book provides insight into how a propaganda legend is fabricated and cashed in.

Tucked away on pages 119 and 122 of the October 6th issue of Der Spiegel, a weekly German news magazine comparable to Time or Newsweek, was a news item of considerable significance. A scientific analysis of the manuscript purported to be the original diary of Anne Frank, a Jewish girl who died in a German concentration camp during the Second World War, has revealed that the manuscript could not have been written before 1951, six years after the end of the war.

The exposure of the Anne Frank forgery is important because of the sheer magnitude of the fraud and the key role it has played in underpinning the entire Jewish scenario of the war. What is known as a fact is that Otto Frank, a Jewish merchant, formerly of Frankfurt, who had been arrested in the Netherlands and interned in the Auschwitz concentration camp during the war, began visiting publishers in 1946 with what he claimed was a diary written by his young daughter during the time the Frank family was hiding from the German police in occupied Holland. The girl later perished at Auschwitz, Frank said.

The diary, filled with touching adolescent reveries and homely little anecdotes, was exactly what the Jewish “Holocaust” propagandists were looking for, in order to generate tearfully sentimental & emotion-laden sympathy for the “persecuted” Jews, as typified by Anne Frank, and generate hatred against the wicked Germans, who had killed her and “Six Million” other Jews.

Otto Frank cashed in on the diary in a big way. Not only did he find a publisher, but he found people hot to buy stage & film rights as well. Shortly after its appearance in book form, the diary had been translated into a score of languages and printed in millions of copies, from all of which Frank received royalties. The English version alone, under the title “Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl”, has sold more than 4,000,000 copies to date. A television dramatization based on the diary was aired in the United States as well.

Almost from the beginning there were charges that the diary was a hoax. Some of these charges were based on the gross inconsistencies between various translations & editions of the diary in book form; it was clear that the text had been heavily edited to help it sell well in different international markets. Other charges were based on internal inconsistencies and credulity-straining elements in the diary itself.

Otto Frank was sued by a New York scriptwriter, Meyer Levin, who claimed that Frank had taken large portions of a script that he had written and had not paid Levin for his work. The court ordered Frank to pay Levin $50,000. One can easily understand why some observers began to wonder how much, if any, of the content of the various Anne Frank books, films, and plays in circulation was actually written by a little Jewish girl named Anne Frank.

When Hamburg pensioner, Ernst Roemer, age 76, began spreading the accusation that Otto Frank had himself written what he was passing off as his dead daughter’s diary, Frank sued him. As usual, the German court upheld the authenticity of the diary. Handwriting experts testified that the entire diary, including loose notes & insertions, had been written by the same hand, and that hand was Anne Frank’s.

Roemer appealed the court’s decision against him, and more handwriting experts were called in. Their conclusion was the same; everything in the diary was in the same handwriting; there was no forgery.

Roemer appealed again, and this time the court asked for the technical services of the Federal Criminal Office, the Bundeskriminalamt, which carried out a careful analysis of the original manuscript of the diary with microscope & ultraviolet illumination in order to confirm its authenticity, and determine when it was written.

The report of the technical experts was given to the court and it contained a bombshell; large portions of the alleged “diary” were written in ballpoint pen ink, which was not manufactured prior to 1951.

Were it not for the previous testimony of the handwriting experts that the entire diary, including the portions written with ballpoint pen, is in the same hand, the father might have claimed that he only “edited” his daughter’s work, “clarifying” passages here and there. But the evidence was quite unambiguous.

It is now quite clear that Otto finished up the “original” of the diary after he had found a publisher in 1946. At that time, his original was nothing more than some rough notes and an idea in his head, which seemed to have prospects for making him a lot of money with little effort. First a typescript for the publisher, and then, as sales of the book began to mount, a completed handwritten “original” to show to doubters.

Just after the report of the Federal Criminal Office was given to the court, Otto Frank conveniently died, before he could be asked a number of very interesting questions. Meanwhile, the worldwide Jewish propaganda apparatus has continued its promotion of the Anne Frank myth as if nothing had happened. Der Spiegel seems to be the only mass-circulation news periodical to have exposed the fraud to date.

QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ASKED

In his book, “Adolf Hitler”, the author, Colin Cross, who brought more intelligence than is usual to the many problems of this period of history, observed astutely that “the shuffling of millions of Jews around Europe and murdering them, in a time of desperate war emergency, was useless from any rational point of view.”

Is it likely, that, at the height of the war, when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts, they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses? To have conveyed three or four million Jews to Auschwitz alone would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities, which were already strained to the limit supporting the far-flung Russian front. To have transported the mythical Six Million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps, and to have housed, clothed and fed them there, would simply have paralyzed their military operations. There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk.

On the other hand, the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners, the number officially known by the Germans to have been registered there, to Auschwitz in the course of the war, at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied to assist the war effort. In fact, of the 3 million Jewish people living in German-occupied Europe, it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time, and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000.

Per the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross, whole Jewish populations, such as that of Slovakia, avoided detention in camps, while others were placed in community ghettos like Theresienstadt. Moreover, from Western Europe deportations were far fewer.

Another question that must also be asked is how can millions of Jewish people be eliminated without a trace in six months? Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret? These are the kind of questions that the critical, thinking person should ask. And he will soon discover that not only the statistical & documentary evidence known to Holocaust revisionists, but simple logistics combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million.

Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature & conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible.

Found at https://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a-holohoax-dont-be-fooled-pt4/